Adam McDade
  • Home
  • Commercial Work
    • Misfit Press
    • Walwick Hall Boutique Country Hotel
    • The Northern Correspondent
    • Cirkus IV - The Blue Star
    • Worry Party
    • Scroobius Pip
    • Nesta
    • END. Clothing
    • Restaurant Illustration
    • The Psychedelic society
    • Dr. Chris Ryan
    • Dead Pirate Crew
    • Firewords Quarterly
    • LoCo
    • TopLad
  • Personal Work
    • Bali Book
    • Personal Practice
    • BBC 6 Music T-Shirt Day
    • Portraits
    • Consumer Cults
    • Regional Narratives
    • Collaborative Illustrations
    • Misc.
  • Tattooing
    • Tattoos
    • Tattoo Designs
    • Prices and Booking
    • Beyond the Epidermis
  • Contact
  • Other
    • Illustration Intervention
    • Shop
    • Friends

Research Trip Report; Bali, January 2020

27/1/2020

0 Comments

 
In February 2019, I was fortunate enough to have been generously granted funding from the Northern Bridge Research Training Support Grant, which allowed me to present my research is Los Angeles (Northern Bridge, 2019). During my trip I spent time with the illustrious professor Stanley Krippner, formerly of Saybrooke University, who upon learning about my tattooing practice and resonance with east Asian arts, connected me with his friend and past colleague, Bruce Carpenter.
 
Bruce is an art historian who specialises in South-East Asian arts, geographically situated in Sanur, Bali, where he is the founder of the organisation, ‘Island Arts’. He has published extensively on Asian arts and many of his books such as ‘Indonesian Tribal Art’ (2016) and ‘Lempad of Bali: The illuminating line’ (2014). After learning of my interest in Asian visuals and desire to better understand the cultural context of the imagery from which I utilise in my tattooing practice, Bruce invited me to visit Island Arts to have access to his extensive personal collections of artefacts and library, and to offer me expertise and insight to my various questions surrounding my adoption of visuals from spiritually imbued Asian arts in Western creative industries. In order to make the trip, RTSG funding was applied for a second time from Northern Bridge, who very kindly made the trip possible in January 2020.
 
After arriving in Sanur in the late afternoon following over 20 hours of travel from the UK, I received a message from Bruce inviting me for breakfast with his family and colleagues the next morning. It was with this spirit of hospitality that the 3-week trip commenced. Bruce spent the first day introducing me to the area, discussing my intent for the trip to enable him to advise accordingly based on my interests, and giving me a tour of his facilities which I was granted access to irrespective of his availability. This included specialist books that are difficult to source in the UK, such as exhibition catalogues for museums such as ARMA (2018) and NEKA (2020); both of which feature traditional Balinese painting from the ‘Kamasan’ region, from which my design practice draws upon. 

After this introduction and direction given to the most appropriate places to visit, I was granted access to all facilities at Island Arts, which were fully exploited through the photography of the various artefacts with Bruce giving me first-hand explanations of the imagery context, and the use of numerous texts. These where created over the duration of the trip, and included Picard (1998) (which is difficult to source and very expensive to buy); Lueras (2003); Lueras and Lloyd, (1987), and Tenzer, (1992). These texts, alongside discussion with Bruce, provided contextual understanding to accompany the work that has been / will continue to be produced for tattooing. Trips to the AMRA, NEKA, and Museum Puri Lukisan in the Ubud area where also made and many of the works photographed. These where then able to be more richly understood through direct discussion surrounding individual pieces with Bruce.
 
In addition to the rich resources that where made available, I also was able to initiate a 30-minute presentation of my work followed by a 20-minute Q and A, at the beautiful, ‘Rumah Sanur Creative Hub’ as part of the LOTS programme (Learn Of Things and Sharing) on Saturday 18/01/2020. The audience where mixed nationality, with around 50% being local residents of Bali, and the remaining either expats or those travelling. In addition to gaining insight on how to effectively communicate my research (with a strong North-East accent) to an audience who don’t speak English as a first language, I was also able to discuss my findings with audience members who ranged from social media managers specialising in tattooing, to anthropology professors, to PhD students utilising ethnographic fieldwork. The range of discussion both during the Q and A and after the event where insightful in gaining a sense of how Indonesian residents respond to imagery from their culture being adopted in Western tattooing practices (in my experience, generally very enthusiastically!) and in how academics and research students from non-design/art fields responded to my findings. I gave the event organiser and venue founder Rudolf Dethu (rudolfdethu.com, 2019), a print of my artwork as an expression of my gratitude, and it is intended to connect further in future visits to Asia. I was also able to spend time with local Indonesian artists from various disciplines (from music – architecture) who attended my talk, which thoroughly enriched the experience.
 
After arriving back in the UK, it is intended to create an informal book that will act as a tattoo design catalogue based on the imagery and culture that I have experienced and worked with over the past 3 weeks. The imagery will be accompanied by text that accessibly communicates the context of the subject matter, based on what was revealed from Carpenter directly, the books consulted, and conversations with the local residents. The purpose of book is to inform those who are opting to adorn imagery that has roots in a spiritual culture of what the subject matter may represent in its original source, in an effort to move away from mere ‘cultural appropriation’ into ‘cultural appreciation’ (Han, 2019). The illustrations where started while on the research trip, and will be continued to be produced over the coming months. Carpenter has kindly suggested to proof-read the document, and advise on any areas that require clarification. In return for such generosity, I have agreed to produce a book cover for an upcoming publication he is in the process of writing titled ‘In Red Weather’.
 
The trip has not only allowed for content that may be used directly within my thesis, but assisted in my confidence in communicating my findings to an international audience, and an opportunity to make a host of valuable contacts on both a professional and personal level. I am sincerely grateful to all those who have made the trip possible, and consider it to be a significant part of my growth as a researcher and individual.
 

Bibliography
 
ARMA (2018) About ARMA – Arma Museum & Resort. Available at: http://www.armabali.com/about-arma/ (Accessed: 4 November 2019).

Carpenter, B. W. (2016) Indonesian Tribal Art. 01 edition. Singapore: Editions Didier Millet.

Han, H.-C. (Sandrine) (2019) ‘Moving From Cultural Appropriation to Cultural Appreciation’, Art Education, 72(2), pp. 8–13. doi: 10.1080/00043125.2019.1559575.

Lempad, I. G. N., Carpenter, B. W., Lukisan, M. P., Darling, J., Hinzler, H., McGowan, K., Vickers, A. and Widago, S. (2014) Lempad of Bali: The Illuminating Line. Éditions Didier Millet.

Lueras, L. (2003) Bali Eye on Indonesia - The Indonesian Humanitarian Foundation. The Indonesian Humanitarian Foundation.

Lueras, L. and Lloyd, R. I. (1987) Bali: The Ultimate Island. Reprint edition. New York: St Martins Pr.

NEKA (2020) Neka Art Museum Ubud Bali - The Development of Painting in Bali - Art Painting Museum. Available at: http://www.museumneka.com/Collection.asp?Category=Transitional%20Style%20Painting (Accessed: 27 January 2020).

Northern Bridge (2019) Northern Bridge Consortium - Newcastle University. Available at: http://www.northernbridge.ac.uk/newsevents/adammcdadeuniversityofsunderland.html (Accessed: 7 October 2019).

Picard, M. (1998) Bali: Cultural Tourism and Touristic Culture. Archipelago Press, Singapore.

rudolfdethu.com (no date) Roars. Rants. Raves. Rambles. Rebel. Rock-N-Roll, RUDOLF DETHU. Available at: https://www.rudolfdethu.com/ (Accessed: 27 January 2020).
​
Tenzer, M. (1992) Balinese Music. Berkeley : Seattle, Wash., U.S.A: Periplus Editions.

​Adam McDade 

Tattooist at Triplesix Studios
AHRC NPIF Funded PhD Research Student at The University of Sunderland

0 Comments

Visible and Invisible mark-making on the conscious canvas: Autoethnographic reflections on tattooing practice.

30/10/2019

0 Comments

 
Client relationship is an integral part of tattooing practice, and has to be established in order to create a client-base. Though the way these manifest may be multitude, one of the key factors is the establishment of a relationship between tattooist and tattooee, that results in the client return. This autoethnographic text is an account of tattooing a returning client on 3 separate occasions, and discusses the formation of a client base, working with a medium on a conscious canvas, and the realisations regarding personal limitations that are brought about through the tattooing process. 

John
(Names changed for confidentiality purposes)

Tattoo 1

John initially came into the studio seeking a tattoo of a symbol from a game that he plays as part of the larger online gaming community. The symbol was circular in shape, with a figure of a coloured fist in the centre and a blue colour in-between the fist and the circle. Carrying a nervous disposition and some difficulty with speech due to a stammer, I tried to adopt a lightness of tone and to have a consultation away from the studio desk area (where they are typically conducted) in favour of the seating area. This was to ensure a more informal setting that I hoped would make John feel more comfortable. After a few minutes’ discussion of size and placement, John was advised to book 3 hours, which would total at £120.
 
On the day of Johns appointment, the regular procedure  that is undertaken for each tattoo was followed – the work station was prepared and sterilised, before the pre-printed stencils of varying sizes where shown to John for his selection, each of which were placed against the part of his arm to be tattooed as an indicator of how they might appear on the body. Once selected, the image was placed through the thermal copier machine to create the transfer, that was then applied to the intended body part, and after a 10-minute waiting period for the stencil to dry, tattooing commenced.
 
The process begins with the black coloured outline, before moving on to colour, working from the darkest to the lightest tone to avoid causing any ‘murkiness’ in appearance. During the tattooing process, conversation ensued surrounding the design choice. John was in his early twenties, and a part of the online PC gaming community. He told me how he was getting this tattoo ahead of his upcoming trip to Center Parcs, where he and a few others who also play the game from which the symbol is from where going together – all of which were from different parts of the UK. His choice to get the tattoo of the gaming symbol prior to his holiday was in part an effort to express his commitment to the community to which he is involved.
 
Part of my social development as a practitioner in a service industry involves ensuring client comfort through attempting to relate. Though not at all interested in gaming to the same extent as John, and so unable to offer much to the conversation in such a regard, I mentioned that I had a strong desire to play the game ‘Street fighter’, that is rooted in a romanticised nostalgic memory of playing the game as an adolescent. John transpired to be very knowledgeable about ‘Street Fighter’, and a prolonged period of time was spent in discussion of our memories of the game.
 
As the conversation developed, John began to ask about my job as a tattooist. He had looked at my work via my ‘Instagram’ page after booking an appointment, as my ‘Instagram’ link is stated on my business card. He noticed that many of the pieces I had created where in black ink only, and stylistically different from the piece I was doing for him, and he was curious as to what made me take on his brief. I explained that the skills required to complete his tattoo could be considered that of a craftsperson – insomuch as the design was already produced and decided, and it simply required a practitioner who was able to work with the materials of tattooing in a skilled manner to create it for him. I went on to explain how although my personal taste maybe more accurately reflected in some of the pieces I had included in my ‘Instagram’ portfolio, I was capable of tattooing in other styles also, and that my thoughts on the tattoo output are of secondary value to the client. I expressed that I was simply grateful to be tattooing, and would only take on work that I felt I good do a sufficient job of.
 
As I informed John of this, I recognised a slight emotion of guilt that was rooted in the knowledge that other more experienced tattooists in the same studio would have been able to produce the tattoo to a higher standard in regards to line quality and colour saturation, but I had taken this job on myself as I had dealt with the initial inquiry and believed I could produce the tattoo suitably. The desire to take on the job in the knowledge that others could produce a better output was not simply for financial sustenance alone (though this may often be the case in similar scenarios with many tattooists), but also to adhere to the pressures of working as a junior tattooist in a successful studio filled with more qualified practitioners, displaying a degree of confidence that demonstrates a desire to be successful and generate income for the studio.
 
As I looked at the tattoo I was producing and noted the comfort that John appeared to be in on a social level comparative to his arrival, despite the physical pain generated for a long duration, I considered how the tattoo experience is more than simply the output of the interaction. As John had trouble with speech occasionally and had vocalised having issues with sociability, I made it my intention to create a space for him to feel comfortable as far as possible, and engaged in conversation. I considered some of the tattooing experiences I have had, with some of the most respected tattooist internationally, and how some of them appeared to not care for the psychological comfort of me as a client in a way that I aim to do for my own clients.
 
Though I am very pleased with the outcome of tattoos from such experiences, the tattoo as a material form is also associated with the memory of a largely negative experience in which I was made to feel inferior or considered as indifferent through lack of interaction, or the audience of egotistical ramblings. When looking at my own tattoos, I recall the experience of getting them, and thus perceive them differently to how I would have, had the tattooist conducted themselves in a different manner. I considered how my attempt to bring myself to the experience of tattooing in such a way that increased the likelihood of a more positive memory for the client could be considered a credential that is valuable to the role, but harder to express in material form.
 
As John and I continued discussing tattooing, he stated that he really liked the style of the work I was producing as a visual artist / designer, and that he would like to have another gaming tattoo produced in a similar style to my own. John then stated he would like to have a ‘Street Fighter’ character piece tattooed somewhere on his body, and I suggested that above the ankle would be a suitable placement due to the size of the area and the size he wanted the piece (relatively small, meaning that somewhere such as an arm would make the piece look lost). As the tattoo experience ended, John stated that he would consider a further tattoo based on our discussion, and wanted to spend some time deciding on a character to be depicted. After receiving aftercare instructions, John had informed me he would be in touch in the future to book in for his next piece. The finished tattoo appeared suitable to fulfil what he required, and I contemplated how if he was unhappy with it, he would not be considering returning to get another piece from me. 

Tattoo 2

A few days later, I received an email from John regarding his character choice for his tattoo. He had selected a character named ‘Vega’ that wore a face mask and a claw, which he deemed to be suitably visually interesting. I invited John to come to studio to discuss further and make a deposit to secure the booking. A few days later John came to the studio, and we discussed the size and specific placement of the tattoo. On the character selection screen of ‘Street Fighter’ games, the player icons are made to face opposing each other to indicate that it is ‘x’ vs ‘x’. John and I considered how as a placement choice we could make it so that the tattoo he gets of ‘Vega’ on his right ankle could be joined by another character being tattooed in the future to echo the way that the selection screen appears.
 
Enthusiastic about the idea for placement, John booked in his first appointment, with the intention of booking in for another in another in the near future in the equivalent place of the opposite leg. On the day of the appointment, the regular procedures were followed of preparing the skin area, placing the stencil on the leg, and performing the tattoo. The character of ‘Vega’ was positioned to face outwards from the inside of the lower left leg. The size of the design was dictated by the area in which it would be placed (in addition to client budget and preference), and as a single tattoo, appeared to read better positioned in such a way compositionally. On leaving the studio, John expressed that he would be back in the near future to book in for another piece.
 
After a few days, John emailed to inquire about coming into the studio again to chat. Though emailing ahead to meeting is not necessary, I had noticed how John appears to feel more comfortable with a formally arranged meeting than just simply, ‘turning up’. We arranged a time and date for a consultation, which John turned up for punctually. With many clients, the consultation takes place stood up over the desk area, however as I had sensed in the past that John is more comfortable talking when seated, I asked him to take a seat in the studio waiting area, where I joined him and offered him some water from the cooler. He showed me how his almost-healed tattoo, which he seemed happy with, and we discussed another character to add to the opposite leg. Unsure of his selection at that point, but sure that he wanted to be tattooed, an appointment was made for the following week, with the request for a decision a few days later to allow sufficient time to produce a drawing. 



Picture
Freshly tattooed 'Vega' piece.
Tattoo 3

I received some image reference from John a few days later, and created a stylised version of the character of his choosing, in a style that was visually similar to the tattoo I had created on Johns other leg. The character of his choosing is named ‘Akuma’ and has notable jewellery around his neck in the form of large wooden mala beads, that make a visually engaging composition. The stencil for the tattoo was created from the source image that John sent, and drawn using a calligraphy pen to create a varied quality of line, with a design that celebrates the qualities of the ‘unfinished’ and the ‘sketch-like’.
 
John turned up on the day of his appointment, selected the appropriate size for his ‘Akuma’ tattoo, and the stencil was then placed on the body. It was at this point that I noticed that the position of the figure was not consistent with the tattoo of ‘Vega’. Although the intention was to make it appear so that the figures were facing each other in a way that emulates the character selection screen of the game, the way that the body frames the tattoos meant that this wouldn’t appear compositionally ‘right’. Upon noticing the contrast, the design was taken back onto Adobe Photoshop, where it was flipped at the exact same size, and printed again to be made into a stencil for a tattoo of consistent orientation.
 
I considered in this time how tattooing is unique in that the body dictates an element of the design choice, in contrast to the traditional 2D surfaces such as paper or canvas. The body is also asymmetric to varying degrees, with centre points often being relative to visual perspective and bodily stance. In this circumstance, John and I agreed that the choice we had taken made more sense, and that should another 2 characters be added to his ankle area, they could be on the outer sides and thus fulfil the original aim to emulate the character selection screen of ‘Street Fighter’.
 
We proceeded to complete the tattoo, with John also interacting with other members of the studio surrounding their mutual interests in TV series and games. I noticed that in this instance John appeared to move more during the process, making tattooing more of a challenge. After moving fairly frequently, I witnessed myself feeling irritable, and simultaneously feeling annoyed at myself for feeling irritable. I understood that the area I was tattooing was prone to create involuntary movements and can be painful, and understood rationally that the movements where not the result of any lack of attempt to stay still. Despite this acknowledgement, I found myself feeling frustrated by the consistent movements, and noticed myself being less engaging with John in the way that I would have liked to have been. In the realisation of this, the frustration turned towards myself; in the moment of tattooing, with the full awareness of the permanence of the medium and the trust placed in me by John to create the piece successfully, I felt that any deviation in the design from my intent, based on client movement, was a failure.
 
I considered my feelings towards the tattoos I had got from tattooists I admire, but that bring to mind not necessarily pleasant experiences, and felt a sense of guilt for potentially creating a similar experience for John. I also felt a sense of ignorance for not taking into consideration that tattoos are not just produced on humans, but by humans, who may have a range of factors affecting their conduct, which may account for some of my personal negative experiences. Fortunately, my irritability did not seem to be picked up on by John, and he seemed very satisfied with both the outcome of the tattoo and the tattooing experience. 

The original positioning of the stencil, which was flipped in order to match the tattoo on the opposite leg.
Freshly tattooed 'Akuma' piece.
Both 'Street Fighter' themed tattoos in context.
Considerations for future practice

As John left, I thanked him for getting tattooed by me, and he told me that he would be in touch soon with other ideas. My experience of tattooing John on 3 separate occasions made me consider how clients can become established based on more than just the tattoo as an output, but on their relationship with the practitioner. The tattoos that I created for John on the second and third occasion where never Johns intentions when he first came in to the studio, but resulted from the initial interaction. I also considered how the experience on the third occasion made apparent that the body as an object has a level of design input, as the tattoo is restricted to the confides of form and flow.
 
My awareness of my ‘shortness’ of attitude with John made me feel regretful of my conduct and lack of ability to override my egoic response to his movements, despite being aware that tattooing is a painful and durational process. The transactional nature of tattooing as an industry requires a level of professionalism as a service, however to divorce the fact that tattoos are produced by humans and on humans results in only a partial understanding of the nature of the role. My experiences with John as they have been recorded here, serve as an example of the layers that exist in tattooing practice, and as a reminder to myself for how to improve my role as tattooist on a material and social level, as well as recognising aspects of myself that are not serving my personal growth. 

​

Adam McDade 

Tattooist at Triplesix Studios
AHRC NPIF Funded PhD Research Student at The University of Sunderland

0 Comments

The 6th British Autoethnography Conference 2019 - Trip Report

12/8/2019

0 Comments

 
Thanks to funding that was generously granted as part of the Sunderland-Northumbria University CDT consortium, I was able to attend and present at the 6th Biritish Autoethnography conference 2019, held in Bristol on the 22nd and 23rd of July. The theme of the conference was of activism through autoethnography, with the website stating "We hope too that autoethnographers can use their bodies, skills and insight to shed light on issues that are difficult to explore and understand, often taboo, or seldom witnessed". The following report is my account of attending and presenting the autoethnographic aspects of my practice-based PhD research - utilising my personal accounts to generate broader cultural understanding on the multifaceted (and often intangible) skills that are required of a contemporary Western tattooist. 

Participation in ‘Doing arts-based research’ workshop with Kitrina Douglas.
M-Shed, Bristol. 22/7.
 
Prior to the conference commencing, multiple workshops where held on varying themes that involved autoethnography. My research adopts a multi-method methodological approach combining autoethnography and practice, and so from the available selection, ‘doing arts-based research’ was deemed the most relevant. The personal aim of attendance was to gain some first-hand insights into how practice and autoethnography may relate, from those who utilise it as their established methodological approach.
 
Kitrina Douglas lead the session, and introduced aspects of her autoethnography work that utilised creative practice (such as music, poetry, and film-making) while working with marginalised groups dealing with taboo topics. Douglas shared a piece of performative autoethnography in the form of a song that she had written when working with marginalised ladies in Cornwall on a 4 day retreat. The song contained lyrics that told the story of one of the ladies’ repression, but also that where her own personal narrative that reflected the sentiments of the lady who she was working with. Douglass explained how the knowledge that was gained was not merely retold in the form of words in such a way that may be deemed exploitative of their biographical narratives, but shared in vulnerability by relating to the narrative personally. As a result, the research output in the form of song was deemed more accessible to non-academic audiences, and able to communicate in such a way that was beyond words alone.
 
The workshop also involved a 2-stage task. Kitrina began the task by whispering a word into the ear of a participant, who was then asked to go into the centre of the room and communicate the word using an absence of the spoken word and through the body and gesture alone. This was then guessed by other participants. The process was followed so that each member of the group was able to perform their given word. On completion, Kitrina asked each of us to write down responses to 3 questions;

1/ How did you feel when given your word?
2/ How did you feel after performing your word?
3/ How did you feel when watching others perform their word.
 
Kitrina then read out our responses in such a way that was anonymous, highlighting the commonalties in our experiences, but uniqueness in our words. Kitrina also utilised the task to serve as an example of how we communicate through much more than words alone, highlighting the use of arts-based outputs when dealing with autoethnographic material.
 
I feel that as a result of attending the workshop, my understanding of what autoethnography is, how it can be utilised and expressed, and the validity of its employment as a research methodology has been enriched. While my PhD research takes the form of a more traditional autoethnographic approach, my understanding of its versatility of application and multitude of form has given me confidence in claiming that I am utilising a form of autoethnography which I now understand cannot be pinned down to a singular approach. 


Attendance of presentations of other researchers / practitioners utilising autoethnographic methodological approaches, and presentation of research. 22 & 23/7.
 
Both the Monday and Tuesday of the conference featured presentations from autoethnographers from a variety of disciplines. The session on Monday the 22nd featured more established autoethnographers such as Ken Gale and David Carless. The work they presented took the form of traditional paper readings, conventionally formatted conference presentations, as well as musical and narrative performances. When the content was presented, the utilisation of the body in its various forms of expression assisted in the communication of the ideas, echoing the sentiments of the workshop held earlier in the day by Kitrina Douglas.
 
An example of this included the presentation titled ‘Trickster Tales’ by Lapin Ammattikorkeakoulu, who presented her autoethnography based on a tradition of call and response that is native to her African origins, and required the audience to recount a story (including actions) to the person who was situated next to them. Lapin then spoke on oral history and storytelling, using her personal narrative and embodied expression to communicate her messages. Other presentations included the themes of parenting in its various forms, and consisted of narrativised anecdotes that speak of the challenges when dealing with topics of toilet training, technology, and discussions on difficult topics such as religion when talking to children. The anecdotes where unique to the researchers, but generalisable in so much as the experiences have common equivalents that can be drawn.
 
I was given the opportunity to present my own research on Tuesday the 23rd, to a receptive audience of around 30 people. As I presented, I became aware that my presentation style was more fluent than it has been in the past due to social anxiety. Despite this still being something difficult to contend with, I recognised that my knowledge of the content that I was delivering allowed me to bypass my emotional responses to public speaking and communicate effectively. As I was speaking, I was made aware of audience engagement with the content through eye-gaze and laughter (where humour was intended). When reading an excerpt of my autoethnographic writing, I also heard an audience member state, ‘Yes! That’s it!’, which assisted in alleviating insecurities surrounding uncertainty as to if I was performing autoethnography ‘properly’. Due to time constraints that where the result of technological issues, no question session was able to be held, however multiple meaningful and mutually encouraging conversations with other presenters ensued throughout the day.
 
As the day continued, I attentively watched other presenters share their work on themes such as working as a counsellor dealing with themes of political contrast between therapist and patient (Travis Heath), working with colleagues with challenging attitudes while caring for patients with dementia (Gary Hodge), and dealing with the harmful institutional pressures and expectations when working within academia (Karen Lumsden). While watching the presentations, I recorded observations and notes on realisations that I was gaining on what autoethnography really is, and how it is valuable when dealing with topics that are difficult to communicate and document in more traditional methodological approaches.
 
The notes included comments such as;
 
‘Autoethnography acknowledges that research is conducted by a human, and doesn’t separate research from the researcher’
 
‘Autoethnography brings the somatic experience to the subject that is being researched, representing a topic with authenticity and recognition of nuance’.

‘Autoethnography is what Jack Kerouac does’

‘Autoethnography is a methodological approach that recognises the notion that we are spiritual beings having a human experience’
 
Though these notes where for my own understanding, they have been included in this report in the spirit of autoethnographic inquiry, as they are records of ideas / thoughts / questions that have been triggered by participating in the conference. In a similar fashion, diagrammatic forms where sketched based on personal interpretation of other presenters’ ways of utilising autoethnography, and how it is appropriate and valid to my own research. These included a visual response Fiona Murrays account of a spin class, that interweaved theory with both chronological narrative and internal workings, in recognition of the experience of participation in such an event. The notes made where not related to the presentation content alone, but what can be learned indirectly from having been present for the presentation. 

Summary
 
Attendance at the sixth British conference of autoethnography allowed me to have opportunity to engage with other practitioners using autoethnography to uncover information that is under represented. In addition, I was able to present my research to a knowledgeable audience and gain feedback, learn of the research of others that may be drawn upon to enhance my own understanding, and introduce my research to a network of (hopefully) potential future colleagues. As a result of my attendance, I feel that I am more confident in both presenting research and in my use of autoethnography, and engaged with my methodological approach as much as I am the subject of my research. I am very grateful to Northumbria-Sunderland CDT directors and AHRC for allowing me the opportunity to have participated in what I deem the most valuable conference I have attended to date. 

Adam McDade
​
Tattooist at Triplesix Studios
AHRC NPIF Funded PhD Research Student at The University of Sunderland

0 Comments

Giving Form to the Intangible

31/7/2019

0 Comments

 
This article was written by Adam McDade and edited by Justine Morrow, and originally appears on the 'Tattoodo' website. What is shown here are screenshots of the article from where it was originally published. The original article can be found here: tattoodo.com/a/2019/07/giving-form-to-the-intangible-meaning-and-transformation-in-tattooing/

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

Adam McDade

​
Tattooist at Triplesix Studios
AHRC NPIF Funded PhD Research Student at The University of Sunderland

0 Comments
<<Previous

    Beyond the Epidermis

    ​Adam McDade

    A document of my experience working as a tattooist at Triplesix Studios, while also serving as a platform for my AHRC NPIF funded research as a PhD student in Design at the University of Sunderland.

    Archives

    May 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    October 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    Adammcdade
    Adammcdadeillustration
    Adammcdadephd
    Adammcdadetattoo
    Ahrc
    Ahrcresearch
    Alexgrey
    Allysongrey
    Amaziograph
    Apprentice
    Apprenticetattoo
    Art
    Arts
    Autoethnography
    Bali
    Banners
    Bez
    Bez666
    Bruce Carpenter
    Chapelofsacredmirrors
    Cirkus
    Colourpacking
    Constructivist
    Cosm
    Craft
    Danhartley
    Design
    Designer
    Designresearch
    Desigresearch
    Dissemination
    Drawing
    Drawingfortattooing
    Education
    Ego
    Egotattoo
    Exercise
    Fakeskin
    Fake Skin
    Frankenstein
    Freehand
    Fruitskin
    Fruittattoo
    Humour
    Illustration
    Kitrinadouglas
    Lettering
    Mandala
    Markmaking
    Memorialtattoo
    Methodology
    Minimumchargetattoo
    Northernbridge
    NPIF
    Pain
    Peteheatlie
    Phd
    Phdinquarantine
    Phdresearch
    Phdtattoo
    Practice
    Practicebasedres
    Practicebasedresearch
    Practiceledresearch
    Reflective Practice
    Research
    Reserach
    Roses
    Rosetattoo
    RumahSanur
    Sailorjerry
    Sanur
    Saybrookeuniversity
    Scrolls
    Seeing
    Skull
    Staceygreentattoo
    Stanleykrippner
    Stenciks
    Streetfighter
    Studio
    Study
    Sunderland
    Tattoo
    Tattooapprentice
    Tattoo Apprentice
    Tattoodo
    Tattooing
    Tattooist
    Tattoomeaning
    Tattoopractice
    Tattooresearch
    TattooTalk
    Text
    Triplesixstudios
    Triplesix Studios
    Ubud
    Universityofsunderland
    Walk-in Tattoos
    Westerntattooing

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.